logo
Italian - ItalyRomână (România)Russian (CIS)Ukrainian (Ukraine)Português (pt-PT)Deutsch (DE-CH-AT)GreekEspañol(Spanish Formal International)French (Fr)简体中文(中国)English (United Kingdom)

Saturday 23rd of November 2024

Home News Latest Universe: Science vs.. Divine Creation
Universe: Science vs.. Divine Creation PDF Print E-mail
Written by Natascia   
Sunday, 19 September 2010 00:17
September 2010 began with the controversial debates of the scientists, the British politicians and religious leaders, all contradictory statements aroused the theorist Stephen Hawking, at the launch his new book The Grand Design.
read in the original
It is among the Royal Astronomical Society President of the United Kingdom, Lord Martin Ress, to clarify his point of view on the universe, the act of creation and human understanding, according to the Daily Galaxy.
Regarding the known universe with space telescopes, Lord Ress Martin is committed to the Big Bang theory, saying that, currently, human knowledge stops at the millions of galaxies discovered so far.
Adept of the current cosmological theories, Ress says astronomer in the Sunday Times newspaper interview that the level of human knowledge stops in front of real walls at distances of 500-800 million light years away from Earth, and reinforcing the idea that in If an isotropic universe, only a safe direction 13 such barriers exist, at distances up to 150 billion light years.
Ress Martin launches as a new direct challenge professionals to current estimates on the age of the universe.
English scholar exemplifies everything in existence Coma cluster already observed by specialists in the universe, the structure that contains over 10,000 galaxies, stretching over a length of more than 1.37 billion light years.
All current cosmological theories are based on concepts of "Dark energy" and "great attractors", which were developed to explain in large measure created a universe that still has not spread evenly at the same pace and same direction as Specify the Big Bang theory.
Lord Ress is currently believed that mankind can not solve and understand the great mysteries of universe creation.
Eulogizing the two great scientists of all time, Albert Einstein and Paul Dirac, English scholar and concludes that if the efforts of scientists were crowned with a solid theory of universe formation, however, human beings brain is not yet prepared to understand.
Thus, he makes a comparison with the existence of a fish in the aquatic environment, noting that "as a fish is less aware of the environment in which they live and swim, so a microstructure of empty space could be too complex for the human brain without outside help. "Meanwhile, Dr. Sean Carroll, Moore Center for Theoretical Physics and Cosmology, is entitled to say that we have no clue yet on the creation of the universe.
At the same register is located and Steven Alexander's last book, published in 2009, In_We Trust, "(A. GOD, B. Darwinism, God and Science C. D. None of the above), in which the author seems it managed to prove on the basis of science logiicii that if evolutionary theory is correct, it is still the biggest scientific blunder of all time.
The book itself remains a challenge of science versus divine creation of the world in six days, according to Genesis.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 


Powered by great Joomla!. Designed by: Free Joomla Template, website hosting. Valid XHTML and CSS. Creative Commons License
Content of www.codru.eu by Codru.eu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione-Condividi allo stesso modo 3.0 Unported License.