As a result of the right to own opinion, every citizen of the Republic of Moldova has any legal means to display their concepts, ideas on different events in society and implicitly to make convictions by public protests.

Every time there is a protest, it is conducted within the law, being allowed to raid with violent transformation which, often leads to anarchy. For, unfortunately, what happened yesterday was not a revolt or revolution, by others, but anarchy, when every man they meet the desires of its conqueror, Netin account the legal and moral rules of living together in society. This mass of young, high adrenaline, without resorting to reason and common sense, vandalized the premises of the Presidency and the Parliament of Moldova, demonstrating their own human folly. They did not have a well defined purpose in their demands, were not based on the principle laid down by Mahatma Gandhi - to protest peacefully - in reaching a compromise with state authorities.

Since the events of yesterday I found 4 important things:

• We do not have yet a real political leader, because that is, how to explain the passivity of the opposition leaders, protesting that credibility is high, to calm the spirits. Or, why did not engage V. Filat or D. Chirtoaca to calm angry and so convince the world to continue protests peacefully, without resorting violence resulted in the destruction and stealing of public property.
• Namely to restore and recover public property destroyed and stolen, all us taxpayers Moldovan, we give money in our pocket, while in realitatear be so facacei guilty.
• After what happened yesterday, I think, the opposition has little ruffle image, proving that he was powerless to coordinate protest activities with thousands of people. On the other hand, Moldova has added to record a bad reputation because a state institution, the police, instead of ensuring security and public order, has incited the population through its repression of peaceful protest when. Moreover, what kind of police do we have when, after the cessation of hostilities, was not involved in protecting buildings destroyed in order to counteract stealing inventory from their premises.
• And not least, is unacceptable silence PCRM representatives, they are representatives of state power and (Voronin, M. Lupu), when they did do anything to invite protesters to respect public order. In this case, assume tacitly, have left details of the event to be consumed, to speculate in their favor.

What happened yesterday did not result in any gain for one party, but an alarm fire on the poor education on democracy and princiipile implementing mechanisms for achieving this in the younger generation.